One March 17, the ICC took control of its first suspect, Mr Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, a Congolese national and alleged founder and leader of the Union des Patriotes Congolais (UPC). Many reports I have seen, including this one, say that Lubanga was first arrested by the DRC's security forces in March 2005, and has been held by them until now.
This March 17 press release from the ICC tells us that,
On 17 March 2006, Pre-Trial Chamber I unsealed the warrant of arrest against Mr Thomas Lubanga.
As provided under article 59 of the Statute, Mr Lubanga appeared before the competent judicial authority in Kinshasa. The Congolese authorities cooperated with the Court in the spirit of the Statute by promptly executing its request. The French Government agreed to cooperate with the Court and, for the purpose of executing the decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I, provided a military aircraft to transfer Mr Lubanga. MONUC [the largely impotent UN peacekeeping force in eastern DR Congo] also provided support to the operation.
On March 18, ICC Chief prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo had told a press conference,
We will present evidence in Court to show how Thomas Lubanga Dyilo designed policies to force
the enlistment and conscription of children under 15 years. We will show pictures of Thomas
Lubanga Dyilo inspecting the camps where children were trained. We will present evidence to
show how Thomas Lubanga used the children to take part in hostilities.
This is the first case, not the last. The investigation is ongoing, we will continue to investigate
more crimes committed by Thomas Lubanga Dyilo and we will also investigate other crimes
committed by other groups. This is important, it’s a sequence. We will investigate crimes
committed by other militias and other persons– this is the first case, not the last.
We are totally committed to staying in Congo – to make sure justice is done.
Congo is moving from years of war to a stable peace. 16.000 militia members were demobilized
by national authorities supported by MONUC and UN working with a coalition of NGO’s. They
also establish community reinsertion programs and they are preparing the country for a free
election. Our investigation is our contribution to building a stable democracy in Congo.
Trial Watch has a good, short background piece on Lubanga. It tells us that the militia he headed, the UPC, was, " a group-- with origins in the Hema tribe-- created in 2000 by Uganda then allied to Rwanda."
The BBC has a fairly full report of Lubanga's trasnfer to The Hague, and the background to the case, here.
Since Lubanga has been languishing in custody near Kinshasa for a year already, I do wonder why his transfer to The Hague has been undertaken just now. Maybe it is indeed just the natural consequence of the ICC arrest warrant against him having been finalized around a month ago and delivered to the DRC authorities on March 14. But surely, many people are also looking at this latest move in the light of the fiasco at the "other" international criminal court in The Hague-- Milosevic's death just ten days ago-- and also of the continuing "soap opera" of the Saddam trial in Baghdad.
In this AP piece, the Hague-based reporter notes that at his March 18 news conference, Moreno-Ocampo said that,
A limited number of witnesses will be called, Moreno-Ocampo said, to minimize the danger for those who testify.
Great job laying out what has been happening with the ICC-DRC case. Just to update on what has been happening since March, on June 1, 2006:
"The International Criminal Court will hold the confirmation hearing in the case against former Congolese militia leader Thomas Lubanga on 28 September, three month later than the initial date set, ICC Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo has said.
'I have requested this postponement because of the resurgence of violence in Ituri which poses the problem of the protection of witnesses,' Moreno-Ocampo said on Wednesday during a media briefing at the court's headquarters in The Hague, the Netherlands."
from (from http://www.irinnews.org/print.asp?ReportID=53641)
and then later that month
At the beginning of June, the court announced a three-month delay to his confirmation hearing, citing the need for greater victim and witness protection measures.
Then on June 28 the prosecution announced the suspension of further investigations into other potential charges against Lubanga, again citing the need to provide adequate protection to victims and witnesses.
(from http://www.iwpr.net/?p=acr&s=f&o=322097&apc_state=henpacr)
Comments